When you buy through link on our site , we may garner an affiliate commission . Here ’s how it works .
teenager do crazy things . Theytake drugs , haveunprotected sex , sit with drunken driver , andpretend to be asleepwhen it ’s clock time to do the dishes .
But it ’s not that they do n’t ponder the the potential result . In fact , a new cogitation receive teens spend more time weighing risk than grownup and in fact often overestimate the odds of a bad outcome . But thedesire for acceptanceamong peers wins out in the decision - making process of a young mind .
Photo taken by Luis Cuellar. There are no usage restrictions for this photo.
Cornell University investigator Valerie Reyna and Frank Farley of Temple University conducted a review of scientific studies on the subject .
compare to adult , teens take about 170 millisecond more weighing the pros and cons of engaging in gamey - risk deportment , the researchers reason out . Adults scarcely retrieve aboutrisk , perhaps because they think they recognize risk intuitively . teenager , on the other hand , take time to think over the endangerment vs. welfare equation .
" In other words , more experienceddecision - makerstend to rely more on fuzzy logical thinking , processing site and job as core [ the essence of their actions ] rather than weighing multiple factors , " Reyna said .
teenager often decide that the benefits of risky behavior prompt satisfaction or compeer acceptance — outweigh the peril , Reyna said . She figures its good to teach teenager some " effect - base " thought process skills , such as putting risks into general categories rather than rebuke with specific data and details .
The result , announced this week , were published in the September progeny of the journalPsychological Science in the Public Interest .
